A client-ready report, delivered how each client wants it
Reports live at a shared link, arrive by scheduled email, or embed where your clients already look — and every client keeps one connected view of their numbers, on your branding.

Improvado is an enterprise marketing-intelligence platform — 1,000+ claimed connectors, data governance, AI agents, and quote-only pricing that third parties report averaging around $30,000/year. Oviond is self-serve client reporting from $40/month. Different leagues; here's the honest comparison, dated and sourced.
By Chris Irwin· Co-Founder & CEO, OviondLast updated
Improvado describes itself as an AI-powered marketing intelligence platform for large enterprises and agencies — SOC 2 Type II, SSO/SAML, customers like ASUS and Activision, tiers metered in hundreds of millions of data rows per year, and an AI Agent sold as an add-on. There are no published prices; a third-party review reports an average of roughly $30,000/year, and its own reviewers describe a ~2-month implementation and a learning curve that suits teams with data engineers. Support is a genuine strength (4.8/5 sub-score on Capterra).
Oviond is not that product — and doesn't want to be. It's self-serve client reporting for agencies: published pricing from $40/month, connect 70+ sources, send white-labeled reports the same day, MCP included. If you have a BI stack, a data team, and enterprise compliance requirements, Improvado belongs on your shortlist. If you have clients waiting on branded reports, it's overkill by an order of magnitude.
| Oviond | Improvado | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | From $40/month billed annually ($50 month-to-month) — 10-client minimum, $4/$5 per client | Quote-only; ~$30,000/year average reported by third parties (not published) |
| Pricing model | One plan tiered by client count | Tiers metered by data volume (200M–1B+ rows/year); AI Agent and governance are paid add-ons |
| Target customer | Marketing agencies and teams sending client reports | Large enterprises and agencies with BI infrastructure and data teams (its own positioning) |
| Integrations | 70+ marketing data sources, plus Google Sheets and custom datasets for data beyond native integrations | 500–1,000+ claimed data sources |
| Time to first report | Same day — self-serve setup | ~2-month implementation reported by reviewers |
| AI & MCP support | MCP server on every plan at no extra cost — pull data, build reports, and manage clients from Claude or ChatGPT | AI Agent (add-on): natural-language dashboards, anomaly detection; MCP with read/write access to its platform connections |
| Reviews | 4.3/5 on Capterra (45 reviews) | 4.5/5 on Capterra (22 reviews); support sub-score 4.8 |
| Company | Founded 2018 | Founded 2015, San Diego, CA; ~$34M raised |
Pricing tables only go so far. These are the screens agencies spend the most time in — real product, no mockups.
Reports live at a shared link, arrive by scheduled email, or embed where your clients already look — and every client keeps one connected view of their numbers, on your branding.

Start every client from the same template, then drag in the data, text, and visuals that client actually cares about. The structure stays repeatable; the exceptions stay manageable.

Schedule a report once and it refreshes and sends itself on your cadence. Your team's time goes to the commentary and next steps, not the copy-paste.

No single tool fits every agency. Here are other credible options and who each one suits best.
A mid-market data-pipeline platform — published pricing from $300/month, metered in flexpoints.
The other enterprise option, focused on AI agents for multi-account marketing — listed from $1,500/month.
Every comparison claim above was checked against each vendor's public pricing and documentation, last verified . Spotted something out of date? Tell us and we'll fix it.
| Claim | Sources |
|---|---|
| Starting price | |
| Pricing model | |
| Target customer | |
| Integrations | |
| Time to first report | |
| AI & MCP support | |
| Reviews | |
| Company |
Improvado doesn't publish prices — its tiers (Growth, Advanced, Enterprise) are metered by annual data volume and quoted by sales, with the AI Agent and data governance as paid add-ons. A third-party review reports an average around $30,000/year (reported, not published — as of July 2026). Oviond publishes its pricing: from $40/month with the 10-client minimum.
Not primarily. Its own reviewers describe it as a data platform that pairs with BI tools — it excels at moving, transforming, and governing marketing data at enterprise scale. Client-facing white-labeled reports are Oviond's core job, not Improvado's.
Improvado's MCP gives read/write access to its governed platform connections — built for enterprise data operations. Oviond's MCP is included on every plan and covers agency workflows: pull client data, build and edit reports, and manage clients from Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP-ready tool.
Oviond does not add a plan-based history window. Available history depends on the connected account and the source platform API, so source-specific retention and API limits still apply.
Honestly: almost everything at enterprise scale — connector breadth, data transformation and governance, compliance certifications, and acclaimed onboarding support (4.8/5 sub-score). It's simply built for a different buyer with a different budget. The overlap with a $40/month agency reporting tool is smaller than the comparison suggests.
Yes — 15 days with every feature included, no sales call required.
Connect a client's channels and send a branded, automated report — free for 15 days, every feature included.