A client-ready report, delivered how each client wants it
Reports live at a shared link, arrive by scheduled email, or embed where your clients already look — and every client keeps one connected view of their numbers, on your branding.
Oviond vs Reporting Ninja: two budget-friendly tools, different limits
Reporting Ninja is one of the cheapest reporting tools around — plans from $20/month with report, user, and account caps per tier. Oviond starts at $40/month with nothing capped but client count. Both ship an MCP. Here's the honest comparison, dated and sourced.
By Chris Irwin· Co-Founder & CEO, OviondLast updated
The real difference: what's capped
Reporting Ninja is genuinely cheap: Starter is $25/month ($20 annual) for 10 reports, 4 users, and 10 connected accounts, scaling to Large at $150/month ($120 annual) for 150 reports, 16 users, and 150 accounts. It bundles five products — a reports platform, Looker Studio connectors, a Google Sheets add-on, a REST API, and a read-only MCP connector — and its ~25 integrations cover the mainstream stack. It's also a very small operation with a thin public review footprint.
Oviond starts at $40/month and caps only client count: reports, dashboards, users, and connected sources are unlimited, and white-label (unlimited themes, one custom domain per client), full API, and a full-workflow MCP are on every plan. If you need a handful of reports at the lowest possible price, Reporting Ninja earns its name. If your reporting is your product, caps become the cost.
Oviond vs Reporting Ninja at a glance
| Oviond | Reporting Ninja | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | From $40/month billed annually ($50 month-to-month) — 10-client minimum, $4/$5 per client | Starter: $20/month billed annually ($25 monthly) — 10 reports, 4 users, 10 accounts |
| Pricing model | One plan tiered by client count; reports, dashboards, users, and sources unlimited | Four tiers capped by reports + users + connected accounts (10/4/10 → 150/16/150); all features on all tiers |
| Integrations | 70+ marketing data sources, plus Google Sheets and custom datasets for data beyond native integrations | ~25 integrations listed, plus Looker Studio connectors and a Google Sheets add-on |
| White-label | Included on every plan — unlimited themes, one custom domain per client in your plan | Branded client portal on a custom domain, custom report branding, branded email delivery |
| AI & MCP support | MCP server on every plan with full workflows — pull data, build reports, and manage clients from Claude or ChatGPT | MCP connector on every plan — read-only access with 6 pre-built analyses (PPC audit, ROAS comparison, anomaly detection…) |
| Historical data | No plan-based history window; available history depends on the connected account and source API | Varies by integration |
| Reviews | 4.3/5 on Capterra (45 reviews) | No Capterra listing found as of July 2026; G2 shows 5/5 from 2 reviews |
| Company | Founded 2018 | Madrid, Spain; very small team per public company data |
What you'd pay as reporting grows
Monthly cost on annual billing at published rates as of July 2026, assuming roughly one connected account and one report per client on Reporting Ninja — multi-channel clients consume multiple accounts and often multiple reports, which moves you up tiers faster.
| Oviond | Reporting Ninja | |
|---|---|---|
| 5 clients | $40/month | $20/month (Starter — 10 reports/10 accounts) |
| 25 multi-channel clients (~75 accounts) | $100/month | $120/month (Large — 150 accounts; report cap 150) |
| 50 multi-channel clients (~150 accounts) | $200/month | At the top tier's limits (150 reports/150 accounts) — beyond it there's no published tier |
Which should you choose?
Choose Oviond if…
- You don't want to count reports or accounts — Oviond caps only client count
- Your clients are multi-channel — 70+ integrations vs ~25
- You want a full-workflow MCP (build reports, manage clients from AI) rather than read-only queries
- You want an established review footprint and product roadmap behind your client-facing tool
Choose Reporting Ninja if…
- Absolute lowest price wins — $20/month annual is hard to beat for a small report set
- You mainly report on the Google stack and want its Looker Studio connectors + Sheets add-on in the same subscription
- Your reporting volume is small and stable (within 10–150 reports)
- You like its 5-in-1 bundle (reports, connectors, Sheets, API, MCP) at one low price
What reporting in Oviond actually looks like
Pricing tables only go so far. These are the screens agencies spend the most time in — real product, no mockups.
Templates you reuse, a client layer you customize
Start every client from the same template, then drag in the data, text, and visuals that client actually cares about. The structure stays repeatable; the exceptions stay manageable.
Recurring delivery without the monthly rebuild
Schedule a report once and it refreshes and sends itself on your cadence. Your team's time goes to the commentary and next steps, not the copy-paste.
More Reporting Ninja alternatives worth a look
No single tool fits every agency. Here are other credible options and who each one suits best.
1. AgencyAnalytics alternatives
Comparing more reporting tools? Our alternatives guide covers 8 platforms with published pricing modeled at 5–100 clients.
2. Oviond vs Reportz
Another budget option — per-dashboard pricing at $9.90 each, with a smaller integration set.
Sources and verification
Every comparison claim above was checked against each vendor's public pricing and documentation, last verified . Spotted something out of date? Tell us and we'll fix it.
View the full source ledger (9 claims)
| Claim | Sources |
|---|---|
| Starting price | |
| Pricing model | |
| Integrations | |
| White-label | |
| AI & MCP support | |
| Historical data | |
| Reviews | |
| Company | |
| What you'd pay as reporting grows — 5 clients |
Reporting Ninja vs Oviond FAQs
Is Reporting Ninja cheaper than Oviond?
At the entry point, yes — $20/month billed annually vs Oviond's $40/month. The difference is what's capped: Reporting Ninja's tiers limit reports, users, and connected accounts (Starter: 10/4/10), while Oviond caps only client count and leaves reports, users, and sources unlimited. Multi-channel clients consume Reporting Ninja's account allowance quickly. Rates as of July 2026.
Both tools have an MCP — what's the difference?
Reporting Ninja's MCP connector is read-only: query your marketing data from Claude or ChatGPT, with six pre-built analyses. Oviond's MCP supports full workflows — pull data, build and edit reports, and manage clients across your whole client list. Both are included on every plan.
How many integrations does each tool have?
Oviond connects 70+ marketing data sources. Reporting Ninja lists around 25 integrations (as of July 2026), plus Looker Studio connectors and a Google Sheets add-on that extend its reach for Google-stack workflows.
Does Oviond cap historical data?
Oviond does not add a plan-based history window. Available history depends on the connected account and the source platform API, so source-specific retention and API limits still apply.
What does Reporting Ninja do better than Oviond?
Honestly: price at the low end, and its Looker Studio + Google Sheets connectors bundled into the same subscription — genuinely useful if your workflow spans those tools. The trade-offs are the caps, the ~25-integration catalog, and a very thin public footprint (no Capterra listing, 2 G2 reviews as of July 2026) for a tool your clients will see.
Is there a free trial of Oviond?
Yes — 15 days with every feature included.
See Oviond on your own client data
Connect a client's channels and send a branded, automated report — free for 15 days, every feature included.